PRESS RELEASE: “A New tool to design safer products”
New publication: A New System to Assess New Chemicals for Endocrine Disruption
A groundbreaking new paper outlines a safety testing system that helps chemists design inherently safer chemicals and processes. Resulting from a cross-disciplinary collaboration among scientists, the innovative “TiPED” testing system (Tiered Protocol for Endocrine Disruption) provides information for making chemicals and consumer products safer. TiPED can be applied at different phases of the chemical design process, and can steer companies away from inadvertently creating harmful products, and thus avoid adding another BPA or DDT to commerce.
The study, “Designing Endocrine Disruption Out of the Next Generation of Chemicals,” is online in the Royal Society of Chemistry journal Green Chemistry.
The 23 authors are biologists, green chemists and others from North America and Europe who say that recent product recalls and bans reveal that neither product manufacturers nor the government have adequate tools for dealing with endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs). EDCs are chemicals commonly used in consumer products that can mimic hormones and lead to a host of modern day health epidemics including cancers, learning disabilities and immune system disorders. The authors conclude that as our understanding of the threat to human health grows, the need for an effective testing strategy for endocrine disrupting chemicals becomes imperative.
Historically, chemists have aimed to make products that are effective and economical. Considering toxicity when designing new chemicals has not been their responsibility. This collaboration between fields expands the scope of both biologists and chemists to lead to a way to design safer chemicals.
Scientific understanding of endocrine disruption has developed rapidly over the past 2 decades, providing detailed, mechanistic insights into the inherent hazards of chemicals. TiPED uses these insights to guide chemical design toward safer materials. And as consumers are increasingly concerned about endocrine disruption (eg BPA, flame retardants) they are demanding products that do not contain EDCs, creating a market opportunity for companies that can take advantage of the new science.
There is a companion website to the paper, www.TiPEDinfo.com. One can access the paper there and learn more about the TiPED system.


Heindel, center, goes to work creating a toxic pumpkin, while Tom Zoeller, Ph.D., left, and Wim Thielemans, Ph.D., take part in the fun. (Photo courtesy of Pete Myers)
The meeting was held on the ground floor of the Coach Barn of the Pocantico Center, which is also known as the John D. Rockefeller Estate. Take a
Tice, left, and Thayer take part in a discussion of the endocrine disruptor screening protocol. (Photo courtesy of Pete Myers)
The TiPED working group enjoyed the fall weather and the beautiful scenery at the Pocantico Center in Tarrytown, N.Y. (Photo courtesy of Ray Tice)




Shorter fibers key to safer carbon nanotubes.
Monday, February 11th, 2013Ali-Boucetta, H, A Nunes, R Sainz, MA Herrero, B Tian, M Prato, A Bianco and K Kostarelos, 2013. Asbestos-like pathogenicity of long carbon nanotubes alleviated by chemical functionalization, Angewandte Chemie International Edition http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/anie.201207664.
A shorter carbon nanotube may be a safer one, according to a group of European researchers who varied the materials’ structural fibers and tested their health effects in mice.
Carbon nanotubes are one of the most common and exciting examples of nanotechnology with potential uses in electronics and medicine, but they are made of fibers that resemble asbestos. The modified nanotubes with shorter fibers were less irritating to the mouse lung and showed no signs of cancer when compared to traditional carbon nanotubes.
This work demonstrates the importance of researchers from different disciplines teaming up to solve problems. When applied to green chemistry, toxicologists and chemists working together can create safer materials to help avoid unintended health and environmental consequences of new chemicals.
Many scientists predict that carbon nanotubes will have many useful applications. The nanomaterials could boost performance of our electronic devices, deliver drugs directly to cells and even enable more affordable space travel through lighter materials.
At the same time, other scientists and health experts worry that carbon nanotubes could create health problems in people. In particular, the fibrous structure of these tubes closely resembles the potent carcinogen asbestos. In fact, lab and animal studies have shown that carbon nanotubes do irritate lung tissue in the same way and lead to lung cancer in exposed animals.
Asbestos has been used in building materials, auto parts and coatings as an insulator and fire retardant. Asbestos fibers are released when products containing asbestos age or are disturbed in remodeling or replacement. When breathed in, the fibers can irritate lung tissue, causing cancer and other lung disease.
Now, a group of scientists report that they can make carbon nanotubes – picture sheets of carbon rolled into a cylinder – that are much safer and have fewer asbestos-like health effects.
By chemically modifying the surface of the very small carbon nanotubes, the researchers created fibers that are 10 times shorter than typical nanotube fibers. They tested these new materials head-to-head in mice with both untreated nanotubes and asbestos fibers.
They found that the chemical treatment produces fibers that caused much less irritation in the mouse lungs and did not show signs of cancer development during the seven days after injecting the nanotubes into the lungs.
More work and further testing are needed to understand the long-term impact of the modified nanotubes, including more details about biological interactions with the new nanomaterials.
The above work by Environmental Health News is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.
Based on a work at www.environmentalhealthnews.org.
Tags: green design, nanotechnology
Posted in Commentary | Comments Off